The Color of Paradise
Pros:
Nice imagery, the performance of the lead child actor.
Cons:
Slow-moving
The Bottom Line:
Definitely a great example of Iranian cinema. Another good choice is Majid Majidi's The Children of Heaven.
|
|
Overall Rating:
|
 |
|
Author's Review
The Colour of Paradise is living proof that not every filmmaker from Iran is a pretentious bore. I have to say that because my memory of Abbas Kiorostamis Where is the Friends Home is only somewhat deluded from the time that I actually watched the thing. Kiorostami also directed the Golden Palm winner The Taste of Cherry, which Ive not seen yet, but which, from what Ive heard, is also a pretty dreary production, unless you talk to the art snobs, who will tell you that its a masterpiece. Of course they call it a masterpiece because its slow, contains no stars, and is from a very obscure part of the world. The fact that Kiorostami is an untalented twit had to be disregarded.
Well, actually, I know that not every film from Iran is terrible. Majid Majidi, Paradises director, also did The Children of Heaven, which is a great movie, sort of an Iranian Truffaut. The Colour of Paradise is also a film which deals with children, but in a different, more melodramatic way. The film benefits from an interesting lead character, and an intriguing glimpse into his world. And Abbas Kiorostami is nowhere to be seen.
Mohammad is a young kid, apparently blind since birth, who, as the film begins, is finishing his term at the School for the Blind. During the day, they do pretty much the same thing that other kids do, except that when they take dictation, the blind kids do it in Braille. As well, the kids seem to pass the time with music and other such things. At the end of the term, however, it is apparent that something is not quite right with Mohammads situation, as he is found, by the teacher, still sitting on the bench hours after all the other kids have been picked up by their parents. The teacher tries to console the kid, and even phones his father on the cell phone to remind him to pick the son up, but it says something about the regard the father has for his own son if a teacher has to phone him to remind him that, hey, your kids waiting for you to take him home!
The regard that the father has is apparent when he actually does show up -- he sees the kid, but keeps walking until he sees the teacher and administrator, and he pleads with them to keep the child for the holidays. You might hope that the father is just desperate because he doesnt have the money to keep him with the family, or something equally understandable, but that couldnt be further from the truth. Once the father has no choice but to take the kid home to the village, he has to take the kid along on errands; he buys some jewellery and a few other things. It turns out that the father is making plans to wed the daughter of a neighbouring family; his wife died a few years ago, and he needs to find a suitable replacement, hopefully someone younger who can take care of him in his old age. The father sees Mohammad as a weight, a punishment by God for whatever unexplainable reason. As usual, selfishness prevails in the fathers personality, as he is completely concerned with his own needs and not the need of others, or of lifes harsh unpredictability.
Majidis direction is filled with beautiful images and interesting shots. One thing the camera shows is the great scenery of Iran; when you think of the Middle East, you probably think of impoverished towns and villages, and while this movie certainly shows us a village that isnt really up to snuff technologically speaking, it also shows us great images of natural beauty. The colour, the greens and the blues, just jumps out at you.
The best thing, though, is the kid who plays Mohammad. It seems obvious to me that this is an actual blind kid playing this role, and he does a great job. I couldnt imagine how the director was able to direct the kid, but obviously the work paid off, because the kid has some great moments. One amazing moment happens during his wait for his father. He hears a noise under the leaves nearby. He feel around the leaves (and drives a curious cat away), and finds a baby bird, fallen from its nest. He puts it in his shirt pocket, walks to the tree, climbs it, and puts the bird back inside. Believe me, I was rather afraid that the poor little bird would end up getting injured, as the kid awkwardly climbed the tree, but all soon becomes well. The kid has much delicacy and patience, necessary due to his lack of sight, and this scene is very compelling just as documentation on how a blind person interacts with the world.
The kid also has some good acting scenes, including an anguished monologue to a blind carpenter (who the father sends the kid to, supposedly to get the kid to learn how to be independent but probably just as much so the father can try getting rid of Mohammad yet again) in which he says that nobody loves him because he is blind. He continues by saying that his teacher told him once that God loves blind people, and responds by asking why God would make them blind. The answer was that God is not visible, but is in all things, and that when he goes to heaven, God will reveal to him and others like him all His secrets. This observation fits in with Mohammads intense study of the sounds and objects of nature -- I think that Mohammad perceives such things to be messages or secrets from God.
The movie moves pretty slowly, but nevertheless, there is little unnecessary content, and the film is just right at 90 minutes. Unlike our good friend Abbas, Majidi at least has some (well, a lot of) skill at telling a story that relies heavily on images, as well as being able to show us a very interesting and quirky character. And the movie ends on a tragic, haunting note that elevates the content of the film into a spiritual level. I suppose that spiritual level involves Islam, but I think everybody will understand the subject matter. Its a beautiful ending, anyway, and The Colour of Paradise is definitely one to see for those interested in Iranian cinema.