Seiko SKA245 Men Watch

Pros: Elegant Looks-Great Comfort & Feel--Seiko's Reputation for Dependability--Best In Class Kinetic Movement

Cons: A screw-down crown would have been nice, but not necessary. Otherwise. no complaints.

The Bottom Line: With a 10-Bar rating, it's an ALL Activity, All Day & Night watch. Top Quality-Elegant Looks-Attention to Detail. Seiko's proven dependability and Kinetic Movement. The name says it all!

Review: With a MSRP of $425, most are listed for less than half that. At that price, it is a steal, a bargain and a truly beautiful and functional timepiece. I scored one new, in the box, complete with manual, ownership card and the full manufacturer's 3 year ...

Pros: Looks great, perfect size, and never needs a battery.

Cons: Haven't owned it long enough for a proper analysis (Though I doubt it would change).

Review: I have had this watch for about two weeks and I love it. It looks much better up close and it never needs a battery (kinetic). I have no regrets on this product and I don't think I will. Once again this a great watch and I highly recommend ...

Pros: Dial size, clarity of markings, kinetic energy feature, masculine appearance, two-tone stainless steel case band.

Cons: No day feature. Manual should be written more clearly.

Review: I have owned the Seiko SKA245 watch for one day. It is the most comfortable watch I have ever worn. The large blue dial with luminous markers and gold toned hour, minute, and second hands is a joy to read. The date at the 3'o'clock position is adequate. ...

Pros: Look ma! NO BATTERIES! NO WINDING!

Cons: Not good for diving. Date needs changing. Don't wear it, won't work.

The Bottom Line: Great watch if you always wear a watch and you want something affordable and low maintenance.

Review: CONVENIENT!!! This watch is the most convenient item I've ever owned. After having worn it for several years, it has never had to be serviced. Because of a small pendulum like device inside the watch, there is no need to wind it. This also means ...

Pros: looks nice

Cons: 2 years old - 3 serious repairs

Review: This watch was purchased as a graduation gift June 2005, and at over $300 i didn't think it was "affordable" as the other reviewer stated. i thought it would be a special long-lived gift. Boy was i wrong, in the 2 years since it's purchase, it has been ...