"It is the journey, not its end, that is what teaches."
Pros:
Sets, plot, beautiful cast and costumes.
Cons:
Ethan Hawke is eye-candy - in a film with DeNiro, of all people!
The Bottom Line:
At home, alone, nothin' but me and The Fluffy Kitty. No man, no phone, rain on the windowpane. Saved by "Great Expectations"!!!!
|
|
Overall Rating:
|
 |
|
Author's Review
One of the drawbacks of dating a cop is the occasional lonely night snuggled up with the VCR and the cat. This movie made such an evening downright enjoyable for me.
As an adaptation of the Dickens classic, Great Expectations succeeds on many levels. Heres how and why:
1.) Plot and Characters 9 out of 10. NOTE FEW, IF ANY SPOILERS HERE It is the 1970s. A young boy,Finn Bell, who lives in the tropical idyll of Floridas Gulf Coast, likes to draw and does it well. After a rather scary sequence where he helps an escaped convict played with Mafioso menace by Robert DeNiro, his rather squalid existence resumes. He is being raised by his restless and rather trampy sister Maggie and her live-in boyfriend Joe. It is abundantly clear that Joes paternal affection for Finn is deep and true and I wish I could remember the actors name who played him, as he did an outstanding job. On a gardening assignment, Joe and Finn meet Miss Dinsmore. Anne Bancroft endows Miss Dinsmore with a loony charm and strangeness that are a real rival for the corresponding Dickens character Miss Havisham. You see, Miss Dinsmore had been jilted at the altar some years previously, and now wanders her crumbling mansion in bizarre (but elegant) 1960s clothing and wigs, a caricature of faded loveliness. Her creepy garden is still set for the reception that never happened. She is also the richest woman in the State of Florida. And so we also meet, without any explanation of her parentage, her lovely but ice cold - young ward, Estella. After this eminently satisfactory introduction, we are given a window into their lives as they progress from the 1970s to the present.
Finns and Estellas lives are entwined throughout the story. This is not an accident. However, as Finns fortunes change, it becomes less and less clear where their lives are going, who they are becoming, and whether their love is strong enough to prevail over the obstacles fate has put in the way. An Asian saying comes to mind It is the journey, not its end, that is what teaches. And boy, does it ever. There are a few plot holes, but I will cover this in the next section. None of these holes kill the story, or even do it any serious damage. But some editing might have rectified them.
2.) Acting - 7 out of 10 This is what happens when you put several actors of varying skill levels in an ambitious film. The more experienced and talented ones outshine the younger, less skilled ones. This happens here to jarring effect.
Finn Ethan Hawke. Hes good-lookin, in an Everyman kind of way. But he frequently looks startled and confused. (Note: his character is supposed to be a bit overwhelmed by life and its twists and turns. But you shouldnt look dazed when caressing your beloveds leg, even if your beloved is Gwyneth Paltrow.) His lines are delivered convincingly sometimes, not so much at others. His character development is stellar, but overall, his performance only rates a C.
Estella Gwyneth Paltrow. Shes good. How can I say this? Well, I doubt that shes a nasty person by nature, and playing this character must have been a stretch. Her Estella struggles against everything she has been taught about love and relationships. Watch for the scene where she and Finn are in a taxi in New York. She explains herself and how she approached the role of Estella, in three succinct sentences. It doesnt hurt that shes beautiful, wears clothes well, and has a lovely voice. You may not recognize her as the public Gwyneth weve all seen at award ceremonies until the final scene. Her character is not really supposed to develop until the very end, despite being given several chances to do so. I would have like to see more of her life towards the end of the movie.
Miss Dinsmore Anne Bancroft. A scene stealer. Her mad, mod portrayal of a 1950s era debutante gone mad is eerie, funny, and disturbing sometimes all at once. Example: Young Finn wanders into her room, and in an attempt to make conversation, says of her big Maine Coon cat, Thats a big cat. Its the biggest cat Ive ever seen! What do you feed it?
Other cats!, she hisses, lunging forward. Finn recoils, and so will you.
She dances around to Besame Mucho and other Doris Day / Petula Clark hits of the day, kicking up a heel and saying Chick-a-boom!. Okay, shes nuts, but, Chick-a-boom?!?!?. Delivered by her, through Chanel-caked lips under hooded Cleopatra eyelids, it becomes both fearsome and funny. Her clothing, wigs and makeup are beyond bizarre, and offer a hint of the madness within. Her sad, sad, realization of the evil she has wrought and the lives she has scarred is convincing, but too short.
The Convict Robert DeNiro In the original Dickens, the Convict appears three times. Here, its only two. I feel strongly that a third appearance would have added much to the film. As character development is an underlying theme, limiting DeNiros strong performance to a handful of scenes between the beginning and end of the film detracted from it. That said DeNiro is riveting, as always, both in his scary menace, and gentle grace.
Supporting cast various. Here at last we have some uniformity. They are all convincing: the English art dealer, Joe, various artsy types, etc. all deliver lines well and serve to actually support the main cast. The movie would not be complete without them.
3.) Sets and cinematography - 8 out of 10. The Florida Gulf Coasts wild beauty and squalid other side are shown in the same flat light found in 1970s-era photos. Its visually perfect to set the tone for the opening of the movie. Paradiso/Perduto Miss Dinsmores crumbling estate, is beautiful and sad; living on Long Island has made me a hopeless case for aging Gilded Age houses. The directors New York City is not mine it is dangerous, loud, scary, and filled with pretentious and brittle people. I suppose it was meant to evoke Dickens 1860s London, but it fails. Manhattan hasnt looked and felt like this since 1985 or so. Ah, but near the end of the film, a magnificent aerial shot of lower Manhattan tore at my heart. In it, The World Trade Center Towers rise tall and proud, like nothing ever happened.
Not a bad cinematic journey for a rainy, cold, and hug-less evening.